Legal statusResearch chemicalBanned in sport (WADA)
Evidence gradeBAt least one human randomized trial
Human studies6published, approximate count
Half-lifeNot establishedtime for levels to halve
Route studiedOral (studied)plus intravenous (studied), subcutaneous injection (marketed, never studied in humans)
What it is
AOD-9604 is a short piece of the tail end of human growth hormone (amino acids 177 to 191) with a tyrosine added at the front. An Australian company, Metabolic Pharmaceuticals, developed it in the late 1990s on the idea that this piece carries growth hormone's fat-burning effect without its effects on blood sugar, growth or IGF-1. In obese mice and rats it did slow weight gain and raise fat breakdown.
In people it did not work. The company ran six placebo-controlled trials in about 900 adults, mostly as a daily pill. The largest, the 24-week OPTIONS trial with 536 enrolled, found no significant weight loss versus placebo, and in February 2007 the company ended development for obesity. A 300-person 12-week trial reported only tiny differences, around 0.2 kg per week on the best dose versus 0.07 kg on placebo, in a conference abstract that was never published in full. The safety data are reassuring on the narrow points measured: no rise in IGF-1 and no antibodies. No human study has tested the injected form that clinics sell.
Read the full overview 1 more
AOD-9604 is not an approved drug anywhere. The FDA put it on its list of compounding substances with significant safety concerns in 2023, and in December 2024 an FDA advisory committee voted 12 to 0 against allowing it in compounded drugs. WADA bans it by name. Claims that it repairs cartilage rest on one published rabbit study.
Structure16 residues
Hydrophobic
Polar
Positive charge
Negative charge
Gly / Pro / Cys
Sequence
YLRIVQCRSVEGSCGF (disulfide bond between the two cysteines)
Length
16 amino acids
Molecular weight
1815.1 g/mol (C78H123N23O23S2)
Origin
Synthetic analog of the C-terminal 177-191 region of human growth hormone, with an extra tyrosine at the N-terminus and the two cysteines joined in a ring.
Mechanism
How AOD-9604 works
What it binds to, and what happens inside the body after that, step by step.
TargetNot defined; acts on adipose tissue without binding the growth hormone receptor
In rodent fat tissue and in isolated human fat tissue, AOD-9604 increased fat breakdown (lipolysis) and reduced fat building (lipogenesis), mimicking one action of growth hormone. Unlike growth hormone, it did not bind the growth hormone receptor, did not make cells multiply and did not cause insulin resistance in rats. Mouse work linked its effect to higher beta-3 adrenergic receptor expression in fat, but the exact target is not defined.
1Fragment of growth hormoneCarries the 177-191 tail of growth hormone, the region linked to fat breakdown in early lab studies.
2No GH receptor bindingIn cell assays it did not compete for the GH receptor or drive cell growth, so it does not raise IGF-1.
3Fat cell effects in the labRaised lipolysis and lowered lipogenesis in rodent and isolated human fat tissue; raised beta-3 adrenergic receptor expression in obese mice.
4Animal weight effectObese mice and Zucker rats gained less weight over 14 to 30 days, without changes in food intake or insulin sensitivity.
5Human resultIn placebo-controlled human trials, the fat-burning effect did not translate into meaningful weight loss.
The research
What the studies show
Human results and animal results are kept apart below. A result in rats tells you a mechanism is plausible. It does not tell you what happens in a person.
BEvidence
Grade B reflects that randomized human trials exist, not that they were positive. Six company-run placebo-controlled trials in about 900 adults found no clinically meaningful weight loss, and the decisive 24-week trial was never published in a journal. The fat-burning and cartilage effects come from rodent and rabbit studies; there are no human data at all for the injected form sold today.
How far the evidence reachesHighest rung: Randomized trials
Cell studiesIn a dish None listed
Animal studiesRodents and other models 3 key studies below
Small human studiesOpen-label, case series Covered by human data
These are questions the published research has not answered.
01Any human data for subcutaneous injection, the way it is sold today.
02Human half-life and how much reaches the blood by any route.
03The full results of the 24-week OPTIONS trial, which were never published in a journal.
04Long-term safety beyond 24 weeks, including cancer risk.
05Whether it does anything for cartilage, bone or joints in humans.
06What is actually in online vials: FDA found inconsistent CAS numbers and sequences among suppliers.
History
AOD-9604 from discovery to today
2000Metabolic Pharmaceuticals researchers publish rodent studies of the hGH 177-191 fragment showing fat breakdown effects.
200512-week, 300-person oral dose-ranging trial reported at a scientific meeting.
2007February: the 536-person OPTIONS trial fails to beat placebo; obesity development is terminated.
2012Company announces a self-affirmed, conditional GRAS food-ingredient determination for up to 1 mg per day.
2013Company-authored safety summary of six human trials published; an Australian Crime Commission report names AOD-9604 among peptides supplied to athletes.
2023September: FDA places AOD-9604 in 503A Category 2 (significant safety risks) for compounding.
2024Nominations withdrawn and Category 2 listing removed; December FDA advisory committee votes 12 to 0 against adding it to the compounding list.
Approval or regulatory milestoneResearch milestone
Regulation
Legal and regulatory status
Research chemical Not approved for human use anywhere and no active approval path.
No product containing AOD-9604 is approved as a medicine by the FDA.
Development as an obesity drug was terminated in February 2007 after the phase 2b OPTIONS trial. In 2012 the company announced a self-affirmed, conditional GRAS (food ingredient) determination by its own expert panel for up to 1 mg per day orally; this was not an FDA review and is not drug approval. WADA 2026 Prohibited List names AOD-9604 under S2.2.3 (growth hormone fragments), banned in and out of competition.
Sport (WADA)
Prohibited. Tested athletes can fail a drug test for it.
Compounding pharmacies
Not allowed in US compounding. FDA placed AOD-9604 in 503A Category 2 (significant safety risks) in September 2023. It was taken off that list in 2024 only because the nominators withdrew their nominations; FDA then reviewed it on its own and proposed not adding it to the 503A bulks list, and its advisory committee voted 12 to 0 in December 2024 against adding it. It does not appear on any FDA category list as of the May 14, 2026 update, which means it is not eligible for 503A compounding.
Unknown in humans; about 3 minutes after IV dosing in pigs
Routes studied
Oral (studied), Intravenous (studied), Subcutaneous injection (marketed, never studied in humans)
Bioavailability
Unknown in humans. A pig study gave an implausible oral bioavailability above 100% because of highly variable data.
Notes
FDA found no human pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic study by any route. Every human trial used oral or IV dosing; the subcutaneous route sold by clinics has no human data.
No human half-life has been published for AOD-9604, so we do not draw a clearance curve. Half-lives quoted online for it are usually estimates from animal data.
Members
Doses used in published studies
This table records the doses that trials and approved labels used, with the source for each row. It is a record of research, not a recommendation, and it is open to free members.
Doses used in published research and approved labels3 rows
Study or labelDoseRouteFrequencyDurationSource
Checking membershipEach row names the trial or label, the dose, route, frequency, duration and a link to the source. Free account, no card.
HeadacheMost frequent event in the IV and oral studies; rates were similar to placebo per the company summary.Common
Diarrhea and flatulenceMore frequent at the 54 mg oral dose in a one-week study.Common
Euphoria5 people on IV AOD-9604 and none on placebo in METAOD002, judged possibly related.Uncommon
Chest tightnessOne severe report at 50 mcg/kg IV, judged possibly related.Rare
Cancers reported during a trialFive serious events in the 12-week oral trial, including basal cell carcinoma, breast cancer and melanoma. Investigators called them unrelated; FDA said the data were too thin to judge.Rare
Injection-related problemsNo human data for subcutaneous use; FDA flagged immunogenicity and aggregation risk for injected compounded peptides.Frequency unknown
Groups with specific risks
No label exists, so formal contraindications are not established.
Pregnancy and breastfeeding: never studied.
Active or past cancer: cancers were reported in one trial and the data are too limited to rule out a link.
Competitive athletes: banned by WADA at all times.
Interactions
No human interaction studies exist.
Clinics market it mixed with BPC-157, aminophylline, naltrexone or topiramate; none of these combinations has been tested.
What people say online, checked against the studies
Tap a claim to see what the studies found.
The claim"AOD-9604 is FDA approved or FDA GRAS."Not supportedThe evidence does not back this
It has never been approved as a drug. The 2012 GRAS claim was a self-affirmed, conditional food-ingredient determination by a company-hired panel for 1 mg a day orally, not an FDA review.
The claim"AOD-9604 melts fat."Not supportedThe evidence does not back this
It raised fat breakdown in rodents and lab dishes, but six human trials found no meaningful weight loss, and the 536-person trial failed outright.
The claim"It does not raise IGF-1 the way growth hormone does."SupportedHuman evidence backs this
Company trials measured IGF-1 and found no change versus placebo, and lab work showed it does not bind the growth hormone receptor.
The claim"AOD-9604 rebuilds cartilage and heals joints."UntestedNobody has measured this in people
The evidence is one published rabbit study using knee injections. No human study exists.
The claim"AOD-9604 is the same as HGH fragment 176-191."MixedSome studies agree, some do not
They are nearly identical and sold interchangeably. AOD-9604 is the 177-191 piece with a tyrosine added at the front; neither has human evidence for fat loss.
Untested pairings
Combinations people discuss
These pairings come up often. Almost none have been tested together in a trial, and the evidence note on each says so plainly.
Marketed by clinics for fat loss plus joint and tissue repair.
EvidenceNo human study of the combination. FDA's review found clinics selling this mix; neither peptide has human evidence for these uses.
Handling
Storage and stability
Dry powder (lyophilized)
No approved product. Vendor safety sheets cited by FDA list freezer storage (about -18 C) in sealed containers away from moisture; no validated stability data exist.
Mixed with water (reconstituted)
No published stability data for any reconstituted form.
New AOD-9604 research, explained when it is published
One email when a trial reads out, a label changes or the FDA acts on a peptide. Free, no selling of peptides, unsubscribe any time.
Frequently asked questions
Does AOD-9604 work for weight loss?
Not in people. Its largest trial, 536 adults over 24 weeks, found no significant weight loss versus placebo, and the developer stopped the program in 2007.
Is AOD-9604 legal?
It is not an approved drug anywhere, US pharmacies cannot compound it under 503A, and WADA bans it. Sellers label it a research chemical.
Is AOD-9604 safe?
Short trials of oral and IV doses showed side effects similar to placebo, no IGF-1 rise and no antibodies. There are no human safety data for injections, and FDA reviewers flagged cancer reports in one trial as unresolved.
What is the difference between AOD-9604 and HGH fragment 176-191?
They are near-identical pieces of the growth hormone tail. AOD-9604 has a tyrosine at the front of the 177-191 sequence. Both lack human evidence for fat loss.
Does AOD-9604 help with knee or joint repair?
Only one rabbit study supports that. There are no human joint studies.
Why did FDA restrict AOD-9604?
FDA reviewers found no evidence it treats obesity, no human data for injections, possible immunogenicity from injected peptides, and unresolved cancer reports. Its advisory committee voted 12 to 0 against allowing it in compounding.