Peptide database / Metabolic (other)

AOD-9604

16-amino-acid growth hormone fragment developed as an obesity pill; it failed its 536-person trial in 2007 and was never approved.

Research chemical WADA prohibited B Evidence At least one human randomized trial

Also called Anti-Obesity Drug 9604, AOD9604, Tyr-hGH(177-191), lipolytic fragment of growth hormone

All peptides Last reviewed October 13, 2026
Legal status Research chemical Banned in sport (WADA)
Evidence grade B At least one human randomized trial
Human studies 6 published, approximate count
Half-life Not established time for levels to halve
Route studied Oral (studied) plus intravenous (studied), subcutaneous injection (marketed, never studied in humans)
What it is

AOD-9604 is a short piece of the tail end of human growth hormone (amino acids 177 to 191) with a tyrosine added at the front. An Australian company, Metabolic Pharmaceuticals, developed it in the late 1990s on the idea that this piece carries growth hormone's fat-burning effect without its effects on blood sugar, growth or IGF-1. In obese mice and rats it did slow weight gain and raise fat breakdown.

In people it did not work. The company ran six placebo-controlled trials in about 900 adults, mostly as a daily pill. The largest, the 24-week OPTIONS trial with 536 enrolled, found no significant weight loss versus placebo, and in February 2007 the company ended development for obesity. A 300-person 12-week trial reported only tiny differences, around 0.2 kg per week on the best dose versus 0.07 kg on placebo, in a conference abstract that was never published in full. The safety data are reassuring on the narrow points measured: no rise in IGF-1 and no antibodies. No human study has tested the injected form that clinics sell.

Read the full overview 1 more

AOD-9604 is not an approved drug anywhere. The FDA put it on its list of compounding substances with significant safety concerns in 2023, and in December 2024 an FDA advisory committee voted 12 to 0 against allowing it in compounded drugs. WADA bans it by name. Claims that it repairs cartilage rest on one published rabbit study.

Structure 16 residues
1. Tyrosine Y 2. Leucine L 3. Arginine R 4. Isoleucine I 5. Valine V 6. Glutamine Q 7. Cysteine C 8. Arginine R 9. Serine S 10. Valine V 11. Glutamic acid E 12. Glycine G 13. Serine S 14. Cysteine C 15. Glycine G 16. Phenylalanine F N C
  • Hydrophobic
  • Polar
  • Positive charge
  • Negative charge
  • Gly / Pro / Cys
Sequence
YLRIVQCRSVEGSCGF (disulfide bond between the two cysteines)
Length
16 amino acids
Molecular weight
1815.1 g/mol (C78H123N23O23S2)
Origin
Synthetic analog of the C-terminal 177-191 region of human growth hormone, with an extra tyrosine at the N-terminus and the two cysteines joined in a ring.
Mechanism

How AOD-9604 works

What it binds to, and what happens inside the body after that, step by step.

Outside the cell Inside the cell
Target Not defined; acts on adipose tissue without binding the growth hormone receptor

In rodent fat tissue and in isolated human fat tissue, AOD-9604 increased fat breakdown (lipolysis) and reduced fat building (lipogenesis), mimicking one action of growth hormone. Unlike growth hormone, it did not bind the growth hormone receptor, did not make cells multiply and did not cause insulin resistance in rats. Mouse work linked its effect to higher beta-3 adrenergic receptor expression in fat, but the exact target is not defined.

  1. 1 Fragment of growth hormone Carries the 177-191 tail of growth hormone, the region linked to fat breakdown in early lab studies.
  2. 2 No GH receptor binding In cell assays it did not compete for the GH receptor or drive cell growth, so it does not raise IGF-1.
  3. 3 Fat cell effects in the lab Raised lipolysis and lowered lipogenesis in rodent and isolated human fat tissue; raised beta-3 adrenergic receptor expression in obese mice.
  4. 4 Animal weight effect Obese mice and Zucker rats gained less weight over 14 to 30 days, without changes in food intake or insulin sensitivity.
  5. 5 Human result In placebo-controlled human trials, the fat-burning effect did not translate into meaningful weight loss.
The research

What the studies show

Human results and animal results are kept apart below. A result in rats tells you a mechanism is plausible. It does not tell you what happens in a person.

B Evidence

Grade B reflects that randomized human trials exist, not that they were positive. Six company-run placebo-controlled trials in about 900 adults found no clinically meaningful weight loss, and the decisive 24-week trial was never published in a journal. The fat-burning and cartilage effects come from rodent and rabbit studies; there are no human data at all for the injected form sold today.

How far the evidence reaches Highest rung: Randomized trials
  1. Cell studies In a dish None listed
  2. Animal studies Rodents and other models 3 key studies below
  3. Small human studies Open-label, case series Covered by human data
  4. Randomized trials Placebo-controlled RCTs, meta-analyses 2 key studies below
  5. Regulatory approval Not approved No
Preclinical: tells you a mechanism is plausible Human: tells you what happened in people (6 published studies, approx.)

In people 2

Randomized trial 2007

OPTIONS phase 2b trial (METAOD006), as summarized by FDA from company filings

536 enrolled (502 randomized) adults with BMI 30 to 45, oral 0.25 to 1 mg daily, 24 weeks

No significant weight loss versus placebo at 12 or 24 weeks; development for obesity was terminated.

Read the study
Randomized trial 2005

12-week oral dose-ranging trial (METAOD005), conference abstract

300 adults with obesity, oral 1 to 30 mg daily

Best dose (1 mg) lost about 0.22 kg per week versus 0.07 kg on placebo; full results never published.

Read the study

In animals and cells 3

Animal 2001

Increase of fat oxidation and weight loss in obese mice with hGH or a modified C-terminal fragment

Obese (ob/ob) and lean mice, 14 days

Reduced weight gain and raised fat oxidation without raising blood sugar; did not bind the GH receptor.

Read the study
Animal 2000

Effects of oral administration of a synthetic fragment of hGH on lipid metabolism

Obese mice for 30 days, plus isolated human fat tissue

Lower weight gain from day 16 with no change in food intake; more lipolysis and less lipogenesis in human fat tissue in a dish.

Read the study
Animal 2015

AOD9604 intra-articular injection in a rabbit osteoarthritis model

32 rabbits with chemically induced knee osteoarthritis

Weekly knee injections lowered cartilage damage scores, more so with hyaluronic acid; no human data exist for joints.

Read the study
Gaps in the research

What nobody has measured yet

These are questions the published research has not answered.

  1. 01 Any human data for subcutaneous injection, the way it is sold today.
  2. 02 Human half-life and how much reaches the blood by any route.
  3. 03 The full results of the 24-week OPTIONS trial, which were never published in a journal.
  4. 04 Long-term safety beyond 24 weeks, including cancer risk.
  5. 05 Whether it does anything for cartilage, bone or joints in humans.
  6. 06 What is actually in online vials: FDA found inconsistent CAS numbers and sequences among suppliers.
History

AOD-9604 from discovery to today

2000202424 years of research history
  1. 2000Metabolic Pharmaceuticals researchers publish rodent studies of the hGH 177-191 fragment showing fat breakdown effects.
  2. 200512-week, 300-person oral dose-ranging trial reported at a scientific meeting.
  3. 2007February: the 536-person OPTIONS trial fails to beat placebo; obesity development is terminated.
  4. 2012Company announces a self-affirmed, conditional GRAS food-ingredient determination for up to 1 mg per day.
  5. 2013Company-authored safety summary of six human trials published; an Australian Crime Commission report names AOD-9604 among peptides supplied to athletes.
  6. 2023September: FDA places AOD-9604 in 503A Category 2 (significant safety risks) for compounding.
  7. 2024Nominations withdrawn and Category 2 listing removed; December FDA advisory committee votes 12 to 0 against adding it to the compounding list.
Approval or regulatory milestoneResearch milestone
Pharmacokinetics

How long it stays in the body

Half-life
Not established
Unknown in humans; about 3 minutes after IV dosing in pigs
Routes studied
Oral (studied), Intravenous (studied), Subcutaneous injection (marketed, never studied in humans)
Bioavailability
Unknown in humans. A pig study gave an implausible oral bioavailability above 100% because of highly variable data.
Notes
FDA found no human pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic study by any route. Every human trial used oral or IV dosing; the subcutaneous route sold by clinics has no human data.

No human half-life has been published for AOD-9604, so we do not draw a clearance curve. Half-lives quoted online for it are usually estimates from animal data.

Members

Doses used in published studies

This table records the doses that trials and approved labels used, with the source for each row. It is a record of research, not a recommendation, and it is open to free members.

Doses used in published research and approved labels3 rows
Checking membershipEach row names the trial or label, the dose, route, frequency, duration and a link to the source. Free account, no card.
Safety

Side effects, higher-risk groups and interactions

2Commonroughly 1 in 10 or more
1Uncommonroughly 1 in 100 to 1 in 10
2Rareunder 1 in 100
1Frequency unknownnot measured in trials
EffectCommonUncommonRareUnknown
HeadacheMost frequent event in the IV and oral studies; rates were similar to placebo per the company summary.Common
Diarrhea and flatulenceMore frequent at the 54 mg oral dose in a one-week study.Common
Euphoria5 people on IV AOD-9604 and none on placebo in METAOD002, judged possibly related.Uncommon
Chest tightnessOne severe report at 50 mcg/kg IV, judged possibly related.Rare
Cancers reported during a trialFive serious events in the 12-week oral trial, including basal cell carcinoma, breast cancer and melanoma. Investigators called them unrelated; FDA said the data were too thin to judge.Rare
Injection-related problemsNo human data for subcutaneous use; FDA flagged immunogenicity and aggregation risk for injected compounded peptides.Frequency unknown
Groups with specific risks
  • No label exists, so formal contraindications are not established.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding: never studied.
  • Active or past cancer: cancers were reported in one trial and the data are too limited to rule out a link.
  • Competitive athletes: banned by WADA at all times.
Interactions
  • No human interaction studies exist.
  • Clinics market it mixed with BPC-157, aminophylline, naltrexone or topiramate; none of these combinations has been tested.

Which symptoms are expected and which mean stop and get help: side effects and red flags.

Claims checked

What people say online, checked against the studies

Tap a claim to see what the studies found.

The claim"AOD-9604 is FDA approved or FDA GRAS."Not supportedThe evidence does not back this

It has never been approved as a drug. The 2012 GRAS claim was a self-affirmed, conditional food-ingredient determination by a company-hired panel for 1 mg a day orally, not an FDA review.

The claim"AOD-9604 melts fat."Not supportedThe evidence does not back this

It raised fat breakdown in rodents and lab dishes, but six human trials found no meaningful weight loss, and the 536-person trial failed outright.

The claim"It does not raise IGF-1 the way growth hormone does."SupportedHuman evidence backs this

Company trials measured IGF-1 and found no change versus placebo, and lab work showed it does not bind the growth hormone receptor.

The claim"AOD-9604 rebuilds cartilage and heals joints."UntestedNobody has measured this in people

The evidence is one published rabbit study using knee injections. No human study exists.

The claim"AOD-9604 is the same as HGH fragment 176-191."MixedSome studies agree, some do not

They are nearly identical and sold interchangeably. AOD-9604 is the 177-191 piece with a tyrosine added at the front; neither has human evidence for fat loss.

Untested pairings

Combinations people discuss

These pairings come up often. Almost none have been tested together in a trial, and the evidence note on each says so plainly.

AOD-9604 + BPC-157

Marketed by clinics for fat loss plus joint and tissue repair.

EvidenceNo human study of the combination. FDA's review found clinics selling this mix; neither peptide has human evidence for these uses.

Handling

Storage and stability

Dry powder (lyophilized)

No approved product. Vendor safety sheets cited by FDA list freezer storage (about -18 C) in sealed containers away from moisture; no validated stability data exist.

Mixed with water (reconstituted)

No published stability data for any reconstituted form.

Guide Reconstitution and storage, explainedMembers Bacteriostatic water, fridge vs freezer, and how fast peptides break down.
Keep reading

Related peptides

The Staate peptide brief

New AOD-9604 research, explained when it is published

One email when a trial reads out, a label changes or the FDA acts on a peptide. Free, no selling of peptides, unsubscribe any time.

Frequently asked questions
Does AOD-9604 work for weight loss?
Not in people. Its largest trial, 536 adults over 24 weeks, found no significant weight loss versus placebo, and the developer stopped the program in 2007.
Is AOD-9604 legal?
It is not an approved drug anywhere, US pharmacies cannot compound it under 503A, and WADA bans it. Sellers label it a research chemical.
Is AOD-9604 safe?
Short trials of oral and IV doses showed side effects similar to placebo, no IGF-1 rise and no antibodies. There are no human safety data for injections, and FDA reviewers flagged cancer reports in one trial as unresolved.
What is the difference between AOD-9604 and HGH fragment 176-191?
They are near-identical pieces of the growth hormone tail. AOD-9604 has a tyrosine at the front of the 177-191 sequence. Both lack human evidence for fat loss.
Does AOD-9604 help with knee or joint repair?
Only one rabbit study supports that. There are no human joint studies.
Why did FDA restrict AOD-9604?
FDA reviewers found no evidence it treats obesity, no human data for injections, possible immunogenicity from injected peptides, and unresolved cancer reports. Its advisory committee voted 12 to 0 against allowing it in compounding.